Charlotte Rainfall By Month 2021, How Old Was Edith Vanderbilt When She Died, Dubuque County Jail Inmates Recent Arrests, Articles C

Why would a hiring mgr want a new employee to be underpaid? The 3 Fs do not belong on pizza: fish, fruit, and fungi. Learning that a direct report has researched their managers resume and background just to figure out how to talk to them just feels off. End up in a new story? Until I retired this month (yay for sleeping in! I agree it is not a perfect analogy because with internet privacy you cant really shut the blinds yet. (on the other parents). I know both of my suggestions would not be easy and would require a huge amount of work, but it can be done. If you are asking to be managed more and they think their role is one with more basic strategic oversight while you handle team management I could see where theyd think you needed management training. Its not like the internet reads your mind and sends you the whole internet history of your co-workers (yet). Im allowed to know it, Im allowed to look it up, Im allowed to use it for legitimate contact purposes. Yeah, my in-laws used to send us a gift card to Harris Teeter for our anniversary every year. The first result when you google me used to be news stories about a child molester in Florida. I dont get being nosey about personal things Im one who actively avoids looking up that kind of stuff about coworkers but I do look folks up on linkedin and on their previous company websites to get a sense of job history and other work related things. The CVs provide more detail about where theyve come from, how long theyve been working, who their networks are with. So it could also be worth asking, Is there anything in particular that youre hoping this training will help me with? want to find contact information) and find some personal information, thats fine. Instead of it being a negative thing, its a positive thing! Looking at your coworkers public work is an essential part of knowing what they actually do. Or at least, neutral knowledge that would be weird if it slipped out. #2, your previous supervisor should never have given out your salary info. I mean, as an analogy, if youre at the supermarket, youre publicly visible and out among other people, but itd still be creepy if someone followed you all through your grocery shopping trip. I tend to go to the same supermarket around the same time on the same day, the people who are there will see me and learn that I shop on a regular schedule. The delivery guy called and said, Im at 123 Main Street, and theres nothing here but a bank, and the boss said, No, 123 Main Street should be the Springfield Building, and the delivery guy said, Im not in Springfield, Im in Spring Green.), what about a $10 prepaid visa card periodically? #5 We have a lot of remote team members. I ended up coming into work late one day so I could drop everything and tour this house and put in an offer the very day it went on the market, so everyone at work knew more about my home-buying process than usual. A major false equivalency. The other thing that individualizes responses is whats actually out there on the internet about you. Then noting when they go to the bathroom. Even if it werent at lunch time, it generally wouldnt be a huge deal to take home a branded pen or notebook. I wouldnt want to talk to 20 people I dont know about this sort of thing and it would also be pretty time consuming. While the company has a strong record for these bonuses, I dont believe my base pay should be less than what I would earn elsewhere. If so, Im sorry. The one we ended up selecting had a blog. Over the line. My bosses have always been cool with me keeping or redistributing as I see fit. colleagues should never snoop or look up information cvs If youre uncomfortable asking them about something, then you probably shouldnt be snooping around about it either. Its another thing to take a look at things they purposefully make public about themselves on a popular social media site. But I am a very curious inquisitive person by nature, I consider it both my best and worst quality about me, and I think most people that know me would agree. But I dont understand how people can post so much info online, but expect people not to look at it/up. Its not on me, or any random person, to determine whether you intended to post something or not. But were privately owned without any contracts involved and no conflicts of interest. In my scenario its that moment where you go Im going to see what else they may have under this alias that youve crossed that line. If it can be found during a garden-variety google search, thats technology for you. If you dont think you can do that, then dont search. on their website which can then be drawn into other searches. Literally llama. Judging by the comments here, Im right that many people will in fact find it creepy if you go too far digging into public information. After all, plenty of very experienced managers are bad managers. Like, in the interview for my current job the whole panel brought up several times that the company was the brainchild of the CEO, he was super involved in the day-to-day of the business, he had won a million awards for his work, I would probably interact with him a lot more than would be usual in another company, etc etc etc. And while the majority work here on campus, a few are remote (people on study abroad, graduates who have continued to work for me, etc.). Whats something related I can do for my remote workers if Im going to feed the crew on-site? Not understanding is one thing (normal!). I dont feel like thats being nosy if anything, if Id done that hed probably have asked me why I hadnt researched him before taking the job. Having the wrong opinions about the wrong coworker might result in rather significant harassment and abuse. Or at least hold these things aside for the rare occasion I come into the office. Of course they should. I think its about knowing what is yours to tell and whats not. If you discover that all your dirty laundry is hanging on the line for everyone to see, then follow the steps to take it down where its possible. Letter #2: Sorry, OP, you had to go through that. Its hard to have rules of thumb because the people who actually need rules wont think the rules apply to them. ), On the other hand, I have never bothered to look up my co-workers on the general internet (I have looked them up on various professional databases or other sites related to our field). It wasnt a violation in 1989 when your address came directly to my house, in the form of a 2000-page book published by US West, either. #1 Beware of finding people with similar names as your co-workers, even living in the same state or same metro area. I think back then if you didnt want your phone number and address to appear in the phone book you could pay to have your information unlisted. @Falling Diphthong This! In my department, supervisors will treat off-siters to a coffee or other food gift card about once a quarter. The easier it is to get away with something and the fewer repercussions (if any) that will result, the more likely people are to indulge in activities they know arent right. That is disgusting and wrong, but it isnt because I put it out there, and I cannot take it down. I dont need you to look me up and prejudge me before youve gotten to know me. Also, yesterday there was the discussion about asking what you do for a living. Maybe consider adding something similar so the community-building aspect is included and not just the free food. There is a difference between looking at what people put online freely which I think is more like viewing their lawn decorations / house maintenance / brilliantly lit Christmas tree in their front window and what is online about them. Look, we live in a precarious time. When I was on a remote team, the manager let us expense a dinner for up to $50 once. Same. Dont do these search early in the process with many candidates that can lead you to unconsciously weeding out certain types of people. People are going to google each other. Dont beat yourself up about this. Most people are not going to go that far with anything they find online, and I think judging people for the mere act of Googling someone is unfair and pretty pearl-clutchy. The best policy is to keep your mouth shut. The latter is more like accidentally catching a glimpse of them lounging on the couch behind the tree (if it pops up high in searches by chance) or spying on them through their various windows, possibly with a pair of binoculars (if it doesnt). So not only am I at the mercy of those other departments when it comes time to review my work, but I get zero credit for or acknowledgment of all of the important things I actually do. Call it what it is, right? And honestly that hasnt happened to me in quite some time.